Tampilkan postingan dengan label The Walrus and the Carpenter. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label The Walrus and the Carpenter. Tampilkan semua postingan

Jumat, 25 Februari 2011

Through the Looking Glass VI -- chapter 4: BLACK BIRD

The first half of Chapter 4 (to the completion of Dee's recitation) manages a balance of true nonsense for nonsense's sake ("The Walrus and the Carpenter," for example, though I think there's yet some revelatory nuggets here anyway) and what I believe to be truly symbolic, either as intended by Carroll or as subconscious manifestation.

What are your thoughts regarding:
  • the music from the tree, which starts when Alice and the Tweedles begin their brief dance and ends abruptly upon their finishing;
  • Alice's narration of her story to her sister;
  • "The Walrus and the Carpenter":
– There is evidence that Carroll intended no symbolism whatsoeverby this poem, and despite uncounted readers' attempts, and that it’s indeed complete nonsense, for Carroll left the choice of the second character to Tenniel, based upon the latter's preference in drawing, betwixt a carpenter, a butterfly, and a baronet.
– (from Roger Green, via Martin Gardner) The operetta Alice, by Savile Clarke extends the ending of the poem with an additional stanza, thus:
        The Carpenter he ceased to sob;
                The Walrus ceased to weep;
        They’d finished all the oysters;
                And they laid them down to sleep—
        And of their craft and cruelty
                The punishment to reap.
        —at which point the ghosts of two oysters return and dance upon the chests of the gluttons.  According to Gardner “Carroll felt, and apparently audiences agreed with him, that this provided a more effective ending for the episode and also somewhat mollified oysters sympathizers among the spectators.”

The second half of the chapter is significantly darker, even if you are an oyster sympathizer.
  1. Which is Alice more justified to "like": the Walrus, who felt sorry for the oysters; or the Carpenter, who ate fewer of them?
  2. The Red King is Carroll.  Defend.
  3. Dee and Dum are mirror opposites (enantiomorphs; examine Tenniel's illustration of Alice preparing the brothers for combat.  Except for the accoutrement, they are indeed mirror images of each other).  If one stood before a mirror, he would not see himself (so to speak), but his brother.  As we're dealing with reflections, what do you think of someone battling with his/her own reflection?
  4. This chapter opens with a famous nursery rhyme, which turns out in the end of the chapter to be prophetic--i.e. the crow actually comes.  Does Carroll, perhaps passively, hope that his writing might be similarly prophetic?  Does he have any such hope?
  5. Interesting bit of double symbolism with the crow: first, consider the quotation from Steinbeck's Tortilla Flat, below; second, the fact that in 585 B.C. the war between King Alyattes of Lydia and King Cyaxares of Medes ended--or was interrupted--by a total eclipse of the sun.  Tangentially, is there a connection between Alice's taking refuge under a tree and the somehow-avoidance of dark and death?
From Tortilla Flat:

        Where is Danny?  Lonely as smoke on a clear cold night, he drifts through Monterey in the evening.  To the post-office he goes, to the station, to the pool rooms on Alvarado Street, to the wharf where the black water mourns among the piles.  What is it, Danny?  What makes you feel this way?  Danny didn’t know.  There was an ache in his heart like the farewell to a dear woman; there was a vague sorrow in him like the despair of autumn.  He walked past the restaurants he used to smell with interest, and no appetite was aroused in him.  He walked by Madam Zuca’s great establishment, and exchanged no obscene jests with the girls in the windows.  Back to the wharf he went.  He leaned over the rail and looked into the deep, deep water.  Do you know, Danny, how the wine of your life is pouring into the fruit jars of the gods?  Do you see the procession of your days in the oily water among the piles?  He remained motionless, staring down.
        They were worried about him at Danny’s house, when it began to get dark.  The friends left the party and trotted down the hill into Monterey.  They asked, “Have you seen Danny?”
        “Yes, Danny walked by here an hour ago.  He walked slow.”
        Pilon and Pablo hunted together.  They traced their friend over the route he had followed, and at last they saw him, on the end of the dark pier.  He was lighted by a dim electric wharf light.  They hurried out to him.
        Pablo did not mention it then, but ever afterwards it was his custom, when Danny was mentioned, to describe what he saw as he and Pilon walked out on the wharf toward Danny.  “There he stood,” Pablo always said.  “I could just see him, leaning on the rail.  I looked at him, and then I saw something else.  At first it looked like a black cloud in the air over Danny’s head.  And then I saw it was a big black bird, as big as a man.  It hung in the air like a hawk over a rabbit hole.  I crossed myself and said two Hail Marys.  The bird was gone when we came to Danny.”

*

The Tweedles always frightened me more than anything else in the two books when I was a kid.

Minggu, 09 Januari 2011

Sunday Poetry X -- The Moon and the Son

EXCERPT FROM LEWIS CARROLL'S "THE WALRUS AND THE CARPENTER" AND NEW APPLICATION:

The sun was shining on the sea,
Shining with all his might:
He did his very best to make
The billows smooth and bright--
And this was odd, because it was
The middle of the night.

The moon was shining sulkily,
Because she thought the sun
Had got no business to be there
After the day was done--
"It's very rude of him," she said,
"To come and spoil the fun!"

APPLICATION:

My son is a night owl.  My daughter is an early bird.  Amazingly, each is happiest (and such childish happiness is spectacular and supremely free and, well, very Wild Things) when the other is asleep.  I've thought a lot about this previously unanticipated cruelty (it's been going on for a while now and heedlessly continues despite all efforts to align all familial routines) and the sheer smiling pleasure it brings to each: perhaps their shifted schedules are adaptations for survival much like eye spots, webbed feet, and pouches are for various other creatures.

So back to the poem.  I'm going to make a connection, but CAREFUL!  Don't go jumping ahead of me!

Go back into the poem and, right along with a correlative change of gender, switch "sun" out for "son," and of course the natural response is to assume that "moon," then, should swap out for "daughter," but this would be inaccurate. If such were the case, the moon-- "daughter" --would not be shining sulkily, but chasing after the sun-- "son" --and screaming and maybe brandishing a stuffed animal or doll or--heaven forbid--her little white stool like a sword or gun or, depending, a bazooka, while the sun-- yes, you know --would be "whooshing" around like Spiderman or Ironman or Superman and be soon to take defensive stance against the newest baddy in the Marvel arsenal.  The moon cannot be my little girl.  Besides, by this time of night, our moon is always fast asleep.

The problem is that my wife and I can't--or won't let ourselves--go to sleep until our boy is asleep (we've got this idealist and likely naive stance against it, but I will spare you the details).  You can imagine the difficulty.  Last night stood out more starkly than others, because our church time has changed from 1pm to 9am.  Remember, we've got two little kids, one of whom is a chronic sufferer of a spectacularly gruesome strain of the morning grumpy bumps.  Again, I will spare you the details, but, just for a second, imagine how a tight white collar and tie is liable to react with such a rash.

Regardless, each night there are quite frequently two moons (generally we take turns, letting one sleep in preparation for his/her turn to shine the following night) eagerly and anxiously awaiting the departure of the shockingly cheerful sun who shines blindingly and obliviously (really, his motives are entirely innocent!  I can't blame him for anything) upon our night--the time otherwise meant for peace and sleep.

All this said, reconsider the same two excerpted stanzas with only minor variation, and imagine our constant discomfort as adequate justification for our sulking:

My son was shining on the sea,
Shining with all his might:
He did his very best to make
The billows smooth and bright--
And this was odd, because it was
The middle of the night.

We moons were shining sulkily,
Because we thought our son
Had got no business to be there
After the day was done--
"It's very rude of him," we said,
"To come and spoil our fun!"

Our consolation, of course, is that--especially in view of his darkling morning grumpiness--at least he's happy, and effulgently so, at least once day.  I can survive.  He is only six, after all.  Unfortunately, grumpiness is as contagious as cheeriness, and these lengthy, tired turns are liable to reveal my dark side.  My apologies (may my son read this someday and understand!).

So, happy Sunday to you all.

I wish you good napping!

*